The title "Homo Deus or Hubris? The Transhuman Agenda of the Globalists" contains a who's who of the global transhumanist scene. Furthermore, the authors outline the historical development and point out the ideological roots of transhumanism. In Ekklesia, right-wingers of various stripes discuss how much transhumanism there is in today's right. In this issue, however, the editors draw clear boundaries and once again take a different, far more optimistic view of the current situation.

Authors: Alexander Markovics, Peter Steinborn, Lars Steinke, Alexander Dugin, Cristian Barros, Wolfgang Bendel, Arnold Rolant, Dominik Schwarzenberger, Tom Dieke, Frank Kraemer, Konrad Winter.

This is the title of the third issue of our magazine for right-wing metapolitics. After dealing with the “Great Reset” and the transhumanist ideas of the elites, this issue continues with key geopolitical issues. The authors deal with the all-important question “Quo vadis, Europe?” and shed light on the ideological and geopolitical possibilities of this “Eurasian tip” (Peter Steinborn).

Right at the beginning, Peter Steinborn outlines Europe's place in the world and Germany's place in Europe in the two-part editorial “A place at the table of kings”. In doing so, our author proves himself to be a visionary who is not afraid to openly name the dark sides of the continent, but at the same time sees Germany in particular as one of the most important players on the Eurasian chessboard. The controversial Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin, who has always been known for his different point of view, offers an outstanding and unique interview. Er zeichnet dem Leser die Widersprüchlichkeit zwischen Land- und der Meeresmacht, wobei er ihn tief in die russische Geopolitik hineinblicken lässt. Meanwhile, Cristián Barros, a professor at the University of Development in Chile, points the reader towards the philosophical foundations from Carl Schmitt to Alexandre Kojeve, leaving the old Europe to die, but not preventing a new birth.

Those who know us know that we always shed light on different perspectives, which is why we also present geopolitical ideas that are independent of Russia and the USA. In Ekklesia, our authors discuss the future forms of government and state in Europe and the reader also gains an insight into other national perspectives on geopolitics. For example, the reader is presented with an opposing position to Russia, which revives the old idea of the Intermarium. Furthermore, sober analyses and possibilities for a new constellation are presented, in which a “Europe of spaces” is seen as realistic in the future.

So anyone expecting one-sided literature in a bipolar geopolitical conception in this issue is likely to be disappointed. Neither Russia nor the USA, neither East nor West, but Europe, Eurasia and the world are the dimensions in which our authors think, even if they may adopt different perspectives. The question is therefore not which master Europe should serve, but how it can secure its place at the table of kings.

In this issue, the reader is presented with geopolitical fundamentals relating to Eurasia, Europe and the most important entities therein. Other authors of this issue are Alexander Markovics, Dominik Schwarzenberger, Tom Dieke, Stefan Brakus, Robert Streuckers, Adam Golkontt and Wolfgang Bendel.